Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 WIS2D 692 - State v. Hager

State v. Hager’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Foucha v. Louisiana · 90 Wis. 2d 97 - Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp. · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the court determines that the record contains facts from which a court or jury would likely conclude the person no longer meets the criteria for commitment, the court shall set the matter for trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 381 Wis. 2d 74 - State v. Hager (In Re Commitment of Hager)
  2. “any change in the expert's knowledge of Mr. Hager or his offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 381 Wis. 2d 74 - State v. Hager (In Re Commitment of Hager)
  3. “the petitioner no longer meets the criteria for commitment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 381 Wis. 2d 74 - State v. Hager (In Re Commitment of Hager)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.