Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 F.2d 389 - Gresham v. United States

Gresham v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

374 F.2d 389 · 1967

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Bulova Watch Co. v. United States · Homan v. United States · Osborne v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Crim.P., provides that any error which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded. The Courts have uniformly held that prejudicial error must be shown before a reversal is justified. (Citations omitted.) The strength of the Government’s case is an important factor in determining the existence of prejudicial error. (Citations omitted.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.