Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 F.2d 894 - Saylor v. United States

Saylor v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

374 F.2d 894 · 1967

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1989

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

70196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 802 · 10 U.S.C. § 831 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Mapp v. Ohio · Fay v. Noia · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The possible allegations against plaintiff, implicit in the private complaint against him and the then current rumors, involved fraud and conflict-of-interest in carrying on his job of helping to provide entertainment for the troops — -not violence, the security or safety of the command, the discipline of servicemen, subversion, or even the theft and embezzlement of federal funds. So far as we can tell, there was no need for an immediate search to prevent use or disposition of weapons, or the instruments or fruits of crime. There was, in other words, no emergency; as a matter of fact, the military waited some time (apparently a month or two) after receiving the private complaint before executing the search. 374 F.2d at 899-900 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.