Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 F.3d 152 - Karageorgious v. Ashcroft

Karageorgious v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

374 F.3d 152 · 2004

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
February 2012
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Yu Sheng Zhang v. United States Department of Justice · Lucina Rojas-Reyes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Uspango v. Ashcroft · Ahmetovic v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because it [did] not attach any new legal consequences to petitioners' pre-IIRIRA conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`attaches a new disability, in respect to transactions or considerations already past.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “living illegally and undetected in the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.