Oblix, Inc. v. Winiecki’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Businesses regularly agree to arbitrate their disputes with each other; giving employees the same terms and forum (the AAA) that a firm deems satisfactory for commercial dispute resolution is not suspect. Employees fare well in arbitration with their employers — better by some standards than employees who litigate, as the lower total expenses of arbitration make it feasible to pursue smaller grievances and leave more available for compensatory awards. See Theodore Eisenberg & Elizabeth Hill, Employment Arbitration and Litigation: An Empirical Comparison, 58 Dispute Resolution J. 44 (2003-04)." Oblix, Inc. v. Winiecki, 374 F.3d 488, 491 (7th Cir.2004).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 219 Ill. 2d 135 - Melena v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

2. “[s]tandard-form agreements are a fact of life”) (citing cases). 9 . Plaintiffs' attempts to distinguish Feldman miss the mark. The Court concurs with the result there and agrees that Plaintiffs have not shown evidence of coercion or. overreaching by YouTube. 10 . The relevant clause here is found in the section of the D.C.Code entitled”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 72 F. Supp. 3d 53 - Song Fi, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

3. “the Seventh Circuit has held that a contract clause that deals with controversies 'arising out of or relating to' an employment agreement picks up claims of employment discrimination.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hill v. Consultants in Pathology, S.C.