Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 F. Supp. 580 - Garner v. Pearson

374 F. Supp. 580 - Garner v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2010

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

8019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Strawbridge v. Curtiss · National Mut Ins Co of District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co Inc · Margaret Williamson v. Katherine Osenton · Quinn v. Phipps · General Rubber Co. v. . Benedict

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs as liquidators, can sue the corporate officers and directors of [the holding company] for breach of fiduciary duties to [the holding company]. This is a direct action under both Florida and Bahamian law [against defendants ... [who] are allegedly directors and officers of [the holding company] itself. The [holding company] through its liquidator, has a direct claim for relief against the defendants ... for their alleged breach of fiduciary duties to [the holding company].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “statements of intent are entitled to little weight when in conflict with the facts,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.