¶1Dissenting Opinion by
¶2Chief Judge Bell and Judge Eldridge dissent essentially for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Dixon v. State, 302 Md. 447, 464-465, 488 A.2d 962, 970 (1985).
374 Md. 114
821 A.2d 389
Decided April 10, 2003
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 2003-04-10
Relies on Dixon v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-04-10
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Facon v. State (2003), State v. Daughtry (2011)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Dissenting Opinion by
¶2Chief Judge Bell and Judge Eldridge dissent essentially for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Dixon v. State, 302 Md. 447, 464-465, 488 A.2d 962, 970 (1985).