374 N.J. Super. 425 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Berkemer v. McCarty · Stansbury v. California · Yarborough v. Alvarado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to neutralize the pressure inherent in custodial interrogation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Pertinent factors include the duration of the detention, the nature and degree of the pressure applied to detain the individual, the physical surroundings of the questioning and the language used by the officer in summoning the individual.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[I]t is the compulsive aspect of custodial interrogation'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.