Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 P2D 624 - Nipp v. State

Nipp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · 20 Okla. Crim. 220 - Goben v. State · 54 Okla. Crim. 207 - Dumas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. The granting or denial of a Motion for Continuance filed on the day of trial,' rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. The action of the trial court in denying a Motion for Continuance will not be disturbed on review unless it can be shown that the action of the trial court was arbitrary and capricious. “2. A person charged with a felony, who had ample opportunity to secure counsel is not permitted to wait until the day preceding the trial of his case to employ counsel, file a Motion for Continuance on the day of trial alleging inadequate time to prepare his defense; and predicate error on the trial courts refusal to grant the same.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.