Lindsey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1969
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 83 Okla. Crim. 159 - Ex Parte Cassidy · 88 Okla. Crim. 450 - Ex Parte Norris · In Re the Habeas Corpus of Duty · 84 Okla. Crim. 446 - Ex Parte Smith · Thornton v. Waters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The sole question in Habeas Corpus proceeding instituted by inmate of the penitentiary under commitment of plea of Guilty to a felony charge, is whether judgment pronounced against this inmate was void.” Lindsey v. State, Okl.Cr., 374 P.2d 628 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Morgan v. State · Sage v. State““When Accused voluntarily entered his plea of Guilty to Information, with advice and aid of counsel, without challenging Information by Motion to Quash or Set Aside the Information, accused waived any right to question proceedings or any irregularity therein.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thornton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.