Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 P2D 925 - Guthrey v. State

Guthrey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1995

9 state decisions

501962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 168 Cal. App. 2d 314 - People v. Hornes · 66 Okla. Crim. 291 - Anderson v. State · 16 Okla. Crim. 118 - Carrico v. State · 66 Okla. Crim. 408 - Smith v. State · 31 Okla. Crim. 253 - Worley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If there was any believable evidence to support defendant’s theory of non-participation in this crime, a different conclusion might have been reached. Though this court is sometimes compelled by the protective feathers of the law to lie flat on its back, it never faces the embarrassment of being compelled to stand on its head in face of uncontroverted evidence from which a logical inference of guilt is the inevitable conclusion.’’-'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Only those questions which were raised in trial court, and on which adverse rulings were made and exceptions taken, and which were then incorporated in motion for new trial and assigned as error in petition in error, will be considered on appeal . . . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.