State v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tanner v. United States · State v. Torrence · State v. Quattlebaum · Washington v. Whitaker · State v. Smart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When á juror conceals information inquired into during voir dire, a new trial is required only when the court finds the juror intentionally concealed the information, and that the information concealed would have supported a challenge for cause or would have been a material factor in the use of the party’s peremptory challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Burgess“[t]here simply is no evidence [the investigator] was involved with any substantive or strategic prosecution work suggestive of betrayal of any secrets or confidences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hawes“Contrary to [his] assertion, ... no breach of confidence occurred and there was no actual prejudice to [the defendant].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hawes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.