James v. James’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1994
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 So. 2d 334 - Cortina v. Cortina · 330 So. 2d 778 - Chandler v. Chandler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendment of the pleadings as may be necessary to cause them to conform to the evidence and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party at any time, even after judgment, but failure to so amend shall not affect the result of the trial of these issues. . .. (emphasis supplied)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kratzer v. Reimiller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.