Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 SO2D 1090 - Nash v. State

Nash v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2012

10 state decisions

7019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Tarrant · 143 So. 2d 817 - Goswick v. State · 232 So. 2d 25 - Bass v. State · 347 So. 2d 1087 - Gilbert v. State · Lindsey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reasoning similar to that found in State v. Johnston, 207 La. 161 , 20 So.2d 741 (1944), is particularly applicable here. Certainly, when one is confronted by another with a gun and does not know it to be unloaded, the natural reaction is to assume that the gun can be fired and can inflict great bodily harm. In such a situation and under the proper circumstances, it would not be unreasonable for the person assaulted to attempt to repel his assailant by inflicting upon him bodily harm, which attempt might result in the death of the assailant or in the deaths of bystanders in the event that the assailant was not subdued. In such a situation, the possibility of death is not unforeseeable even though the assailant did not load his gun. This view comports with the general definition of a "deadly weapon" as one likely to produce death or great bodily injury. Goswick v. State [ 143 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1962)], supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.