Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

374 So. 2d 18

Smith v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1979-06-19

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2007

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relies on 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 346 So. 2d 56 - Herzog v. Herzog

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-06-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have carefully considered the appellant’s four points on appeal challenging the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered below and conclude that no abuse of discretion has occurred. While we may have awarded the appellant/wife a greater amount of alimony and child support had we been the trial judge, was are not at liberty to substitute our judgment for that of the court below. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

¶2Affirmed.

/374/so2d/18 · .json · Public domain