Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 So. 2d 755 - Slocum v. DeWitt

374 So. 2d 755 - Slocum v. DeWitt’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Messer v. London (1983), Dixon v. Hughes (1991)

31 state decisions

15019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 318 So. 2d 917 - Charbonnet v. Hayes · 259 So. 2d 113 - Rich v. Martin · 361 So. 2d 319 - Soileau v. Board of Sup'rs, St. Martin Parish · Mix v. Blanchard · 360 So. 2d 921 - Jory v. Arnette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he domicile of each citizen is in the parish wherein he has his principal establishment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... in light of the quoted definition the word actually serves to emphasize the residency aspect of domicile. It is interesting to note the dialogue among the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in drafting this article. It is apparent the delegates intended to limit candidacy for political office to citizens who actually live in the district they aspire to represent. The newly drafted constitutional article was designed to eliminate a system under which candidates would establish a `political domicile' from which to seek office even though they chose to live and maintain their families in another area, and were not truly representative of the district from which they sought election.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““... any doubt should be resolved in favor of permitting a candidate to run for public office. After all, he still has to face the voters who will, and should, exercise the final judgment on his candidacy.” Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.