Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 374 SO2D 992 - In re Rule 9.331

In re Rule 9.331’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2007

9 state decisions

501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Textile Mills Securities Corp. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hree judges shall consider each case and the concurrence of two shall be necessary to a decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 479 So. 2d 90 - Chase Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Schreiber · 422 So. 2d 911 - Schreiber v. CHASE FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N
  2. “to maintain uniformity in the court's decisions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 470 So. 2d 703 - Marr v. State · 789 So. 2d 1032 - Morris v. State
  3. “I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied professional judgment, that the panel decision is contrary to the following decision(s) of this court and that a consideration by the full court is necessary to maintain uniformity of decisions in this court: (citing specifically the case or cases).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 377 So. 2d 700 - In Re Rule 9.331, Determination of Causes · 948 So. 2d 774 - University of Miami v. Wilson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.