Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

374 S.W.3d 397

Ward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-08-28

Decided 2012-08-28

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2Cody L. Ward appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 2 motion. Ward claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to explain why he should waive a preliminary hearing, and that the waiver resulted in Ward not knowing the strength of the State’s evidence. Ward claims his guilty plea was unknowing as a result. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

/374/sw3d/397 · .json · Public domain