Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
75 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 114 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2013 · most notably Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976), Elfbrandt v. Russell (1966)
75 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedJose Maria Gastelum-Quinones v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Yates v. United States · Galvan v. Press · Scales v. United States · Cardillo US v. Liberty Mut Ins Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a drastic sanction, one which can destroy lives and disrupt families....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must therefore be premised upon evidence . . . more directly probative than a mere inference based upon the alien's silence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baxter v. Palmigiano · PAUL“neither described what petitioner would have heard at the convention nor suggested that there was any prerequisite such as officership or executive responsibility to petitioner's attendance, at the convention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. PAUL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.