Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

374 U.S. 97

Randolph v. Virginia

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1963-06-10

Cited by 6 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1964

2 state decisions

Relies on Peterson v. City of Greenville · Avent v. State of North Carolina

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Vacated and remanded · 9–0 · Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1963-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. New-some, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr., for petitioners.

Robert Y. Button, Atty. Gen. of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, 83 S.Ct. 1119.

¶2

Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville, supra, and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 248, 83 S.Ct. 1133.

/374/us/97 · .json · Public domain