Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 Ark. 200 - Bryant v. Hendrix

Bryant v. Hendrix’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2024

2 district · 10 state decisions

60200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hodges v. Huckabee · St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Circuit Court · Crowder v. Gordons Transports, Inc. · Anglin v. Johnson Regional Medical Center · Rhuland v. Fahr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the specific context of claims for wrongful death and survival, this court has held that an original complaint that asserts wrongful-death and survival claims and is filed by a party without standing is a nullity and provides nothing to which an amended complaint could relate back.... [A]n amended complaint that substitutes the original plaintiffs and replaces them with entirely new plaintiffs does not constitute an amendment to the original complaint but rather is the filing of a new lawsuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “On appeal, Appellants do not contend there are disputed issues of fact; rather, they argue the circuit court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment on the basis of the statute of limitations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.