Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 F.2d 265 - Corbett v. Borandi

Corbett v. Borandi’s Empirical Analysis

375 F.2d 265 · 1967

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2008

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

11019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alford v. United States · Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co. · Fleischman v. Reading · Lenahan v. Pittston Coal Mining Co. · Thompson v. American Steel & Wire Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It can thus readily be seen that the mere mention of the word ‘insurance’ in the trial of a case is not fatal but the context in which it is laid is of controlling importance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.