Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

375 F.2d 298

Docket No. 21047.

Corrington v. Webb

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-04-05

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-04-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2002

7 federal appellate ·

3019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lionel Richman, Lewis Garrett, Herbert M. Ansell, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief Civil Div., Larry L. Dier, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and HALBERT, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant instituted this action in the district court seeking reinstatement to the Civil Service position from which he was removed, and back pay. The district court granted the government's motion for summary judgment on the ground of laches, there being a thirty-four month delay between final removal of appellant from his position at the administrative level and the filing of the law suit to review that removal.

¶2

We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district judge in the granting of the government's motion for summary judgment on the ground of laches.

¶3

Affirmed.

/375/f2d/298 · .json · Public domain