Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 F.2d 663 - Wilson v. Bailey

Wilson v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

375 F.2d 663 · 1967

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 1982 · most notably United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New York (1970), Tyler v. Beto (1968)

15 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

180196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Mapp v. Ohio · Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We may judicially notice that every competent trial lawyer in North Carolina knows that the contemporaneous objection rule obtains in this State, i.e., that failure to object to evidence is ordinarily a waiver. See Stansbury, North Carolina Evidence, § 27, at 59-52 (2 ed. 1963). “Unlike the situation in Henry v. State of Mississippi, 379 U.S. 443, 85 S. Ct. 564 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 408 (1965), there was here no motion for directed verdict on the ground of an illegally obtained incriminating statement which can be said to have notified the trial judge of the possibility of an unconstitutional trial. At no time during the entire trial was the judge’s attention directed or invited to the question of whether unlawfully obtained evidence had been received.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.