Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

375 F.2d 776

Docket No. 23716.

Lee v. Ritsch

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-04-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1967

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; William A. Bottle, Judge.

Davis Lee, pro se.

R. E. Bradford, H. B. Edwards, Jr., Valdosta, Ga. (Bradford & Bradford, Valdosta, Ga., on the brief), for appellees Georgia Christian Institute & Wm. J. Long, Superintendent.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and FULTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This case demonstrates the difficulties encountered by a layman seeking to vindicate his rights in court without the aid of counsel. Nevertheless it also indicates the degree to which the trial court endeavored to protect the rights of the plaintiff before he finally concluded that it was necessary to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be

¶2

Affirmed.

/375/f2d/776 · .json · Public domain