Ocasio v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
375 F.3d 105 · 2004
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1186 · 8 U.S.C. § 1186A (§ 216 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Saideh Fisher v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Dallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Henry v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Yongo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the INS may not use an affidavit from an absent witness `unless the INS first establishes that, despite reasonable efforts, it was unable to secure the presence of the witness at the hearing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“fundamental fairness of the IJ’s reliance on [the] affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.