Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 F.3d 1169 - In Re: Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy

In Re: Gordon R. England, Secretary of the Navy’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

28 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Upjohn Company v. United States · Lamie v. United States Trustee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n reversing the district court’s decision with respect to promotion selection boards, we do not decide whether proceedings of other statutory selection boards are discoverable. Neither the district court nor the parties addressed that as a distinct question, and analysis of it may turn in part on a proper understanding of Section 618(f). We accordingly, vacate the district court’s decision with respect to continuation on active-duty and selective early retirement selection boards, and remand for further consideration. The parties should be afforded the opportunity to litigate, and the district court in the first instance to decide, whether continuation on active-duty and selective early retirement board proceedings are protected, and to what extent, in light of our decision on the proper reading of Section 618(f).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Supreme Court has consistently instructed that statutes written in broad, sweeping language should be given broad, sweeping application.”). 6 . As with other claims of privilege made during civil litigation, however, the withholding party must make the claim of privilege and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “There is no inherent ambiguity in the phrase 'may not be disclosed' that would justify departing from those plain terms pursuant to a judicially-crafted exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.