Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 F.3d 805 - Nunes v. Ashcroft

Nunes v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

375 F.3d 805 · 2003

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 18 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Ahmed v. Ashcroft (2004), Singh v. Gonzales (2007)

10 federal appellate · 18 district ·

340200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Taylor v. United States · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r · School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc. · Katuria E. Smith v. Tyson Marsh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]utility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of a motion for leave to amend.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) bad faith; (2) undue delay; (3) prejudice to the opposing party; (4) futility of amendment; and (5) whether the plaintiff has previously amended his complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[L]eave to amend should be granted unless the district court 'determines that the pleading could not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.