Radkov Dp v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
375 F.3d 96 · 2004
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Ping Chen v. U.S. Attorney General (2007), 376 F. Supp. 2d 42 - Enwonwu v. Chertoff (2005)
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Angie Chesser v. Amos Sparks · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The time for filing a review petition begins to run when the BIA complies with the terms of the applicable regulations by mailing its decision to a petitioner's address of record. Even if, as the petitioners contend, the mailing in this case somehow went awry without any fault on the part of the BIA, that circumstance alone would not excuse the failure to file a timeous motion to reopen.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“according due weight to the BIA's expertise in construing the statutory framework that it administers.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the immigration context, as elsewhere, an error of law on the [agency's] part [amounts to] an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.