Tirreno v. Mott’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Olano · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Tierney ex rel. Newton v. Davidson · Ruggiero v. Krzeminski · United States v. Polouizzi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only a burden of production, i.e. , 'the duty of producing evidence of consent' " on the defendant. Tirreno v. Mott , 375 Fed.Appx. 140 , 142 (2d Cir. 2010) ("[T]he law of this Circuit is not clear in assigning the burden of proof regarding consent in a § 1983 action for unlawful search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“only a burden of production, i.e. , 'the duty of producing evidence of consent'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.