¶1 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3 Robert Strickland, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer and dismissing his employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strickland v. Baker, No. 3:08-cv-02721-CMC (D.S.C. Jan. 12, 2010).
¶4 Strickland also appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Finding no abuse of the district court’s discretion, we likewise affirm that order on the reasoning of the district court. Strickland v. Baker, No. 3:08-cv-02721-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). See Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 402 (4th Cir.1998).
¶5 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶6 AFFIRMED.