Oracle Corp. v. Parallel Networks, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co. · Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc. · Pause Technology LLC v. TiVo Inc. · Hydril Company Lp Uk v. Grant Prideco Lp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. A computer-implemented method for managing a dynamic Web page generation request to a Web server, said computer-implemented method comprising the steps of: routing said request from said Web server to a page server, said page server receiving said request and releasing said Web server to process other requests, wherein said routing step further includes the steps of intercepting said request at said Web server, routing said request from said Web server to a dispatcher, and dispatching said request to said page server; processing said request, said processing-being performed by said page server while said Web server concurrently processes said other requests; and dynamically generating a Web page in response to said request, said Web page including data dynamically retrieved from one or more data sources. 9. A networked system for managing a dynamic Web page generation request, said system comprising: one or more data sources; a page server having a processing means; a first computer system including means for generating said request; and a second computer system including means for receiving said request from said first computer, said second computer system also including a router, said router routing said request from said second computer system to said page server, wherein said routing further includes intercepting said request at said second computer, routing said request from said second computer to a dispatcher, and dispatching said request to said page server said pa”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.