Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

375 F. App'x 362

Fenner v. Bell

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-04-26

Decided 2010-04-26

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. Bell, No. l:08-cv-00367-TDS-DPD, 2009 WL 6372547 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIMED.

/375/fappx/362 · .json · Public domain