United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Giglio v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Johnson v. United States · Viereck v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by permitting the government to present the direct testimony of three cooperating witnesses without immediate cross-examination of each witness,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Loomis“fully cross-examine[] all three cooperating witnesses”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Loomis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.