375 Ill. App. 3d 966 - People v. Bobo’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 378 Ill. App. 3d 580 - People v. Walton (2007), 403 Ill. App. 3d 884 - People v. Mims (2010)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · 68 Ill. 2d 149 - People v. Perruquet · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese · 102 Ill. 2d 181 - People v. Krankel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial judge listened to defendant and discussed his allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel with him. The record reflects that the trial court's actions were appropriate and demonstrated adequate review and inquiry into defendant's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The record shows that the court considered defendant's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel as they arose and determined, in essence, that defendant did not bring forth a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“conclusory, misleading, or legally immaterial, or do not bring to the trial court's attention a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court may be excused from further inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.