Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 NW2D 671 - Klaes v. Scholl

Klaes v. Scholl’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2019

8 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jacoby · People v. Jones · Dahlen v. Landis · Carrick v. McFadden · United States v. Greschner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(B) In civil cases. Evidence of character for violence of the victim of assaultive conduct offered on the issue of self defense by a party accused of the assaultive conduct, or evidence of peaceable character to rebut the same:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(a) Reputation or Opinion. In all cases in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. On cross-examination, inquiry is allowable into relevant specific instances of conduct.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Id. at 675 . Yet we held it was improper for the district court to have admitted specific instances of the citizen's prior conduct. Id. at 675-76 . We rejected the notion that character is an essential element of a claim of self-defense, stating, We believe, however, that in cases like this one the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.