Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 P2D 199 - Lowe v. Boggess

Lowe v. Boggess’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2002

5 state decisions

3019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindsey v. Leavy · Dainard v. Johnston · Gilbertson v. City of Fairbanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The motion shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing, and may be supported by affidavits setting forth concise statements of material facts made upon personal knowledge. There must also be served and filed with each motion a memorandum showing that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The adverse party not later than two days prior to the hearing may serve opposing affidavits, a concise “statement of genuine issues” setting forth all material facts as to which it is contended there exists a genuine issue necessary to, be litigated, and any other memorandum in opposition to the motion. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.