Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 P.2d 270 - Blake v. State

Blake v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2004

9 state decisions

4019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crutchers v. Skeen · 16 Okla. Crim. 549 - Muldrow v. State · In Re the Habeas Corpus of Gregory · 71 Okla. Crim. 430 - Sparks v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 60 - Ex Parte Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If defendant, upon arraignment, pleads to the merits and enters on trial, he waives right to preliminary examination, or, if one was held, and irregularities therein.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where a defendant voluntarily enters a plea of guilty, or enters a plea of not guilty, and goes to trial, he will be deemed to have waived any right he may have had to question the fact that he did not have a preliminary examination, or that the transcript filed by the committing magistrate in the district court is insufficient.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““A defendant, prosecuted for a public offense, whose trial has been postponed upon his application is not in position to urge dismissal for delay.” Art. 2, § 6; T. 22, OSA, § 812.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.