Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 P.2d 978 - Couch v. State

Couch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
5
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2005

9 state decisions

3019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Lim Dum Dong · The People v. . Rogers · People v. Hower · 94 Okla. Crim. 145 - Mott v. State · People v. Travers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ “There is, in truth, no injustice in holding a person responsible for his acts committed in a state of voluntary intoxication. It is a duty which every one owes to his fellow men, and to society, to say nothing of more solemn obligations, to preserve, so far as lies in his power, the inestimable gift of reason. If it is perverted or destroyed by fixed disease, though brought on by his own vices, the law holds him not accountable, but if, by a voluntary act, he temporarily casts off the restraints of reason and conscience, no wrong is done him if he is considered answerable for any injury which, in that state, he may do to others or to society,” * * * “It must be ‘settled insanity’, and not merely a temporary mental condition * * * ” ’ which will relieve one of the responsibility of his criminal act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The test of criminal responsibility for committing criminal act is fixed at point where accused has mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong as applied to the particular act, and to understand the nature and consequences of such act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.