Lamb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 1976
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goodnight v. State · 88 Okla. Crim. 97 - Pebworth v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 151 - Barnett v. State · 79 Okla. Crim. 415 - Hoehn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * [T]his court has repeatedly held that where a conviction rests upon circumstantial evidence, and circumstances are proved from which a reasonable and logical inference of guilt clearly arises and which excludes any reasonable hypothesis except the guilt of the accused, although the evidence is conflicting, Court of Criminal Appeals will not disturb the verdict for insufficiency of the evidence. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farrar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.