Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

375 So. 2d 363

Trickey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1979

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1979-10-04

Relies on Guglielmo v. State

Decided 1979-10-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions, but remand for resentencing to provide appellant an opportunity to study and make known to the sentencing court any errors which may appear in the presentence investigation report. The report was disclosed only a few minutes before the sentencing hearing and the trial court erred in failing to defer sentencing upon defense counsel’s request. See Guglielmo v. State, 318 So.2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.713. Remanded for resentencing.

McCORD, Acting C. J., SHIVERS, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.
/375/so2d/363 · .json · Public domain