375 So. 2d 364 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 450 So. 2d 621 - State v. Jackson (1984), 399 So. 2d 194 - State v. Guiden (1981)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Manson v. Brathwaite · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · Consolidation Coal Co. v. South-East Coal Co. · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The witness's opportunity to view the defendant at the time the crime was committed; (2) The degree of attention paid by the witness during the commission of the offense; (3) The accuracy of any prior description; (4) The level of the witness's certainty at the time of the identification; and (5) The length of time elapsed between the crime and the identification.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“"... My understanding of the rule that has emerged from prior decisions is that there is a two-fold requirement, first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as `reasonable' ..." 389 U.S. at 361 , 88 S.Ct. at 516 (Harlan, J., concurring) quoted in State v. Williams, supra, at 370 and State v. Lamartiniere, supra, at 528 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"To constitute res gestae the circumstances and declarations must be necessary incidents of the criminal act, or immediate concomitants of it, or form in conjunction with it one continuous transaction."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.