Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 SO2D 768 - Martines v. Martines

Martines v. Martines’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meyers, Whitty & Hodge, Inc. v. Popich Marine Const. · Hall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appeal cannot be taken by a party who confessed judgment in the proceedings in the trial court or who voluntarily and unconditionally acquiesced in a judgment rendered against him. Confession of or acquiescence in part of a divisible judgment or in a favorable part of an indivisible judgment does not preclude an appeal as to other parts of such judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.