Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 So. 2d 840 - Downer v. State

375 So. 2d 840 - Downer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably McGahee v. Massey (1982), 395 So. 2d 1175 - Pressley v. State (1981)

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

20019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Harriss · Cox v. State of Louisiana · Adderley v. Florida · Corallo v. United States · Rose v. Locke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is sufficient if the prosecutor establishes that the defendant was on notice that he was not authorized to enter the portion of the public building in which the alleged trespass occurred. Only if the defendant at tidal challenges the authorization of one who has posted notice of or who has otherwise communicated this restriction, is the state required to prove the identity of the individual and his authority to restrict access to the portion of the public facility in question.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whoever, without being authorized, licensed, or invited, willfully enters or remains in any structure or conveyance or, having been authorized, licensed, or invited is warned to depart and refuses to do so, commits the offense of trespass in a structure or conveyance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[b]ecause the state did not introduce evidence as to the identity of those who had placed the restrictive signs in the hospital, nor proof of their authorization to do so, it purportedly failed to establish a prima facie case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.