Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 SW2D 253 - Pritchett v. Marshall

Pritchett v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2014

23 state decisions

90196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodwin v. City of Louisville · Jefferson County Ex Rel. Coleman v. Chilton · Kendall v. Beiling · Moore v. Louisville Hydro-Electric Co. · Commonwealth v. Frost, Com. of Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a concept we consider broad enough to embrace both due process and equal protection of the laws, both fundamental fairness and impartiality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.