Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 U.S. 169 - Corey v. United States

Corey v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

294
cited by 294 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

197 federal appellate · 9 district · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 294 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. DiFrancesco (1980), United States v. Hahn (2004)

197 federal appellate · 9 district · 39 state decisions — followed in 11 states

7201963197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCorey v. United States (from First Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Cobbledick v. United States · Berman v. United States · United States v. Smith · Korematsu v. United States · Miller v. Aderhold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 294 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the court desires more detailed information as a basis for determining the sentence to be imposed, the court may commit the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General, which commitment shall be deemed to be for the maximum sentence of imprisonment prescribed by law, for a study as described in subsection (c) hereof.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Final judgment in a criminal case ... means sentence. The sentence is the judgment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A sentence ... imposed only after the whole process of the criminal trial and determination of guilt has been completed, sufficiently satisfies conventional requirements of finality for purposes of appeal. The litigation is complete as to the fundamental matter at issue-the right to convict the accused of the crime charged in the indictment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.