Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 375 U.S. 52 - Bartone v. United States

Bartone v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

333
cited by 333 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

163 federal appellate · 9 district · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 333 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2023 · most notably United States v. Young (1985), Beck v. United States (1964)

163 federal appellate · 9 district · 54 state decisions

8601963197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBartone v. United States (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Fay v. Noia · McNabb v. United States · Rakes v. United States · Bartone v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 333 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) xhaustion ought not be required when the 'state procedural snarls or obstacles preclude an effective state remedy.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “error[ ] in enlarging the sentence in the absence of petitioner[ ] was so plain in light of the requirements of Rule 43 that it should have been dealt with by the Court of Appeals, even though it had not been alleged as error”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “May a United States District Judge orally revoke the probation of a Defendant in open court and in the presence of the Defendant and his counsel and impose a sentence of confinement for a specific period of time and thereafter enter a formal written judgment and commitment in which a larger and longer sentence of confinement is imposed and set forth?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.