Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

376 F.2d 153

Docket No. 23892.

Wright v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1967.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-04-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-04-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Max Pope, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

¶2R. Maeey Taylor, Melton L. Alexander, Asst. U. S. Attys., Birmingham, Ala., Macon L. Weaver, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

¶3Before BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Appellant was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2312 and 2313, by transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce, knowing the same to have been stolen, and by receiving the vehicle. •

¶6The sole contention of error is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment of conviction entered thereon. We disagree. The evidence was more than ample.

¶7Affirmed.

/376/f2d/153 · .json · Public domain