United States v. Dillard’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.2d 365 · 1967
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 26 U.S.C. § 4701 · 26 U.S.C. § 7237
Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · Rodriguez v. New York · Kimbrough v. United States · Ditson v. California · Lynum v. State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It shall be unlawful for any person to purchase, sell, dispense, or distribute narcotic drugs except in the original stamped package or from the original stamped package; and the absence of appropriate taxpaid stamps from narcotic drugs shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this subsection by the person in whose possession the same may be found.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The offense described in * * * § 4704(a) * * * does not include a particular state of mind as an element of the offense. Any sale of narcotic drugs is a violation of § 4704(a) unless the drugs are sold in the original stamped package or sold from the original stamped package. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.