Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

376 F.2d 850

Docket No. 16013.

Moore v. Gardner

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 21, 1967. Decided April 27, 1967.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-04-27

2 counsel of record

Relies on Moore v. Celebrezze · United States v. Ruck

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-04-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1993

701967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sol R. Gitman, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Morton Hollander, Chief, Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C. (Barefoot Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., William Kanter, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought pursuant to 405(g) of Title 42 U.S.C.A. We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.

¶2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Davis in his opinion reported at 252 F.Supp. 593 (E.D.Pa.1966).

/376/f2d/850 · .json · Public domain